# Travis Scott SB Dunk reps: PK 2.0, "3.0", "4.0" and why version numbers confused everyone **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Tags:** discussion, historical\ **Created:** [October 20, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198 "2026-10-20T21:05:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![beaterbudget\_07](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/beaterbudget_07/32/277_2.png) [@beaterbudget\_07](https://superreps.net/u/beaterbudget_07)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/1 "2026-10-20T21:05:42Z")
Lore thread. 🎮 When the Travis Scott SB Dunk Low came out, the rep version became a mess of numbers: PK 2.0, PK God “3.0”, PK 3.0, PK 4.0. Who actually made what, and what did the community conclude back then? Related threads: [Jordan 1 Low sizing](https://superreps.net/t/jordan-1-low-sizing-true-to-size-or-half-down-insole-numbers-explained/76), [Travis Scott x Jordan 1 Low Reverse Mocha](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-x-jordan-1-low-reverse-mocha-ljr-vs-gx-vs-cvw-the-comparison-of-the-week/21), [Travis Scott Jordan 1 High](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-jordan-1-high-les-anciennes-batches-et-comment-on-les-portait/201). ---
**Author:** ![stitch\_auditor](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/stitch_auditor/32/301_2.png) [@stitch\_auditor](https://superreps.net/u/stitch_auditor)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/2 "2026-10-20T21:05:48Z")
Start with the first big wave of threads. A “2.0” from the PK factory was announced as the first major revision. The same week, a different factory known as “PK God” was advertised as “3.0”, even though commenters pointed out there had never been a PK God 2.0. ---
**Author:** ![freshlaces](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/freshlaces/32/303_2.png) [@freshlaces](https://superreps.net/u/freshlaces)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:05pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/3 "2026-10-20T21:05:54Z")
Wait, so PK and PK God aren’t the same? ---
**Author:** ![stitch\_auditor](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/stitch_auditor/32/301_2.png) [@stitch\_auditor](https://superreps.net/u/stitch_auditor)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/4 "2026-10-20T21:06:04Z")
That’s what those early threads said: different factories with similar names. A middleman’s post even claimed there were three separate ones (PK, PK God and PK BASF). That’s a claim from an interested party, so read it as such. ---
**Author:** ![sole\_sleuth](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/sole_sleuth/32/276_2.png) [@sole\_sleuth](https://superreps.net/u/sole_sleuth)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/5 "2026-10-20T21:06:14Z")
And skepticism was loud. One comment from that same wave summed it up: version numbers may just be production dates with marketing on top. ---
**Author:** ![halfsize\_up](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/halfsize_up/32/298_2.png) [@halfsize\_up](https://superreps.net/u/halfsize_up)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/6 "2026-10-20T21:06:18Z")
A bit later, an in-hand review called a “PK 3.0” pair the best version: shape, swoosh, laces, suede, tongue and print. Several other threads agreed. ---
**Author:** ![midsole\_alchemist](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/midsole_alchemist/32/278_2.png) [@midsole\_alchemist](https://superreps.net/u/midsole_alchemist)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/7 "2026-10-20T21:06:20Z")
Then another round: people questioned whether a “4.0” sold through one particular shop was actually from the PK factory at all. Same pattern again. ---
**Author:** ![retro\_canestro](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/retro_canestro/32/304_2.png) [@retro\_canestro](https://superreps.net/u/retro_canestro)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/8 "2026-10-20T21:06:21Z")
And much later there was still a thread trying to rank all the versions. A sign that it still wasn’t all clear. ---
**Author:** ![freshlaces](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/freshlaces/32/303_2.png) [@freshlaces](https://superreps.net/u/freshlaces)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/9 "2026-10-20T21:06:38Z")
So what’s the lesson? Ignore numbers? ---
**Author:** ![sole\_sleuth](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/sole_sleuth/32/276_2.png) [@sole\_sleuth](https://superreps.net/u/sole_sleuth)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/10 "2026-10-20T21:06:42Z")
Timeline and lesson: | Stage | What the community reported | | --- | --- | | First wave | PK “2.0” released as first big revision; “PK God 3.0” advertised without a known 2.0 | | First wave | claims of three separate factories with “PK” names; skepticism about numbering | | A bit later | “PK 3.0” reviewed as the best version | | Next round | doubts whether a “4.0” listing was really from PK | | Much later | ranking threads still sorting out the versions | [[PHOTO: Travis Scott SB Dunk Low side view showing the paisley and plaid panels and the swoosh]] **Lesson:** version numbers aren’t standardized. Different factories used similar names, and numbers could be set by whoever listed the pair. QC the pair against retail: paisley print, plaid, suede, swoosh shape and laces. ---
**Author:** ![beaterbudget\_07](https://superreps.net/user_avatar/superreps.net/beaterbudget_07/32/277_2.png) [@beaterbudget\_07](https://superreps.net/u/beaterbudget_07)\ **Post date:** [October 20, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://superreps.net/t/travis-scott-sb-dunk-reps-pk-2-0-3-0-4-0-and-why-version-numbers-confused-everyone/198/11 "2026-10-20T21:06:53Z")
Patch notes with no official changelog. Classic. 😂 Marking it.