[Demo] QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · WATCH-13313

[sr_demo_01503]

Synthetic demo • AI-assisted. Fictional discussion exercise with simulated dates. No real purchase, customer review, patient, expert identity or experimental result is represented.

A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate? This is an explicitly synthetic discussion case for reviewing evidence and documenting uncertainty; it does not describe a real purchase, patient or experiment.

Discussion record: WATCH-13313. No additional facts are implied by this exercise format.

[sr_demo_01504]

Synthetic demo • AI-assisted. Fictional discussion exercise with simulated dates. No real purchase, customer review, patient, expert identity or experimental result is represented.

Start with function, legibility, assembly and clear visible damage. Explain what the full-size image shows, what the crop adds and what remains uncertain; do not turn an overlay into an automatic verdict.