Back when the washed, distressed logo tee was the defining luxury tee, the reviews made an interesting case study: some “flaws” turned out to match retail. What did reviewers report?
Related threads: Box logo hoodie reps from the hype years, the thread on Rick Owens sizing and Archive reps: does accuracy matter.
Early on, one version got a harsh review:
thin fabric faded print, wrong red shade no brand tagsAnd the good ones? Were there any? 
A later review of a larger luxury collection praised one version for tags, distressing, fit, embroidery and the wash. The fit point mattered: retail was a relaxed, slightly oversized tee.
The wash is the hardest thing to copy: retail had an aged finish (vintage effect, wear marks) that gives an irregular colour. A flat dye looks new straight away.
And the “flaw that wasn’t”: another review noted no distressing on the collar and sleeves. That matched the retail version of that season. 
Which is why context matters. A QC checklist written for one season can turn correct details into “flaws” for another.
Distressing can be added, but faking an even wash at home rarely works. If the wash is wrong, I’d pass on that version rather than try to fix it.
So what’s the takeaway review checklist?
Review checklist built from those old reports:
Fabric
mid-weight, soft
thin (early complaint) washed, irregular colour; correct red shade faded or flat colour, wrong red matches the retail season (one season’s retail had none on collar and sleeves) present and clean missing relaxed, slightly oversizedIf you have one, post a close-up of the print so the washed, irregular colour shows.
Lesson: compare against retail photos from the same season. A detail from one season can look like a flaw against a photo from another.
The season point is the essential one. Marking it.